I was in a remote district hospital on Tuesday where I rounded on all the patients in the hospital, about 30. We saw a child of 8 years who was anemic to the tune of a blood concentration of less than 1/3 of usual. He had been admitted on several occasions "because he eats dirt", and had no platelets (the blood cells that promote clotting). I took one look at his blood count (called "full blood count" or "FBC") and had the diagnosis. His red cells were so small and so pale that they appeared like platelets on the automated count. He was so iron deficient that he had "pica" or "geophagia" and had the uncontrollable urge to eat dirt for its iron content. "So its not that this is abnormal. It is because he has no iron stores, is HIV+, and has a diet that is deficient in iron" I desperately wanted to add "you idiots!!!!" but there was that voice in my head again...We inquired about his diet which was awful as he came from a poor family and ate just twice a day, grain at that, no meat, and little green vegetables. We gave him some iron that was to be taken three times a day for three months, no just five days that had been prescribed on previous admissions.
On to the OPD where I functioned as the visiting surgeon, dermatologist, and family doc. I saw no less than three women who had abdominal paid that was characteristic of gastro-esophgitis (2) and lateral abdominal wall pain. As all had persisted in there complaints the MOs had obtained ultrasound scans on all of them. This happens way too frequently there as the MOs are fatigued and want to fish for a diagnosis that will satisfy their "customers" as the Ministry of Health has taken to calling patients. What garbage (the MoH not the MOs)....But I digress. All three now had become fixated on needing to have their gall bladder removed as it was the seat of all that ailed them. I tried and tried to explain that they in fact had "asymptomatic chloelithiasis" and that we had learned long ago that surgery had no place in this process and causes more complications than it fixes. All left unhappy...sigh.
Then a fascinating young woman. She was seeing me because she had a spectrum of complaints that made no pathophysiologic sense otherwise known as somatization. I have been trying to get the MOs to call this symptom complex "somatization" as it is more medically descriptive than as an example, "waist ache". As I sifted through the 4cm of her chart, there it was: "raped in 9/09". She was simply trying to reconstruct her life after a vicious attack that had completely destroyed her security. We made a plan to see her frequently and who cares about the complaint, just be with her.
Then my turn. It was a classic last patient of the day. The pilots were calling me to get to the strip so we could get back to Gabs before dark. My colleagues were in the truck waiting to go to the strip and in walks a woman with" stiffness" and "dizziness"....If I had a tebe for every one of the women (classically) that had had these same complaints... I did my best to take a good history, do a perfunctory physical, and explain that while I believed that she had a problem, it wasn't serious and that it should be resolved in two weeks. She was seen the day before and wasn't better so she came see the"specialist". A bit of a misnomer in my case, but be that as it may...I basically saw her fast and sent her on her way.
Now the OPD is constructed such that the docs can leave out the back door if they need a break or need to consult on another patient, a good thing. As I was leaving I had the chance to observe her walk from behind and noted that she had a wide based gait. I caught up to her and checked a few more things, noted that she had a coarse tremor (how the hell did I miss that?), added the fact that she had a very un-animated expression and there it was starring me in the face: Parkinsonism. This of course explained her stiffness and dizziness. We started her on the appropriate medication and she should improve within the week.
The dots Mike, connect the freakin' dots.